%0 Journal Article %T What do women and healthcare professionals expect of decision aids for breast cancer screening? A qualitative study in France %+ Université Paris Cité (UPCité) %+ Laboratoire éducations et promotion de la santé (LEPS) %+ Collège National des Généralistes Enseignants (CNGE) %+ Département universitaire de médecine générale, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord (DUMG USPN) %+ Centres municipaux de santé universitaires de Pantin (CMSU Pantin) %+ Université de Poitiers %+ Université Sorbonne Paris Nord %+ Nantes Université - UFR de Médecine et des Techniques Médicales (Nantes Univ - UFR MEDECINE) %+ Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie et Immunologie Intégrée Nantes-Angers (CRCI2NA ) %+ Système Nerveux Autonome - Epidémiologie, Physiologie, Ingénierie, Santé (SNA - EPIS) %+ Health Service and Performance Research (HESPER) %+ IMRB - CEPIA/"Clinical Epidemiology And Ageing : Geriatrics, Primary Care and Public Health" [Créteil] (U955 Inserm - UPEC) %A Amélie, Aïm-Eusébi %A Ruelle, Yannick %A Frèche, Bernard %A Houllemare, Mélanie %A Bonillo, Aurélie %A Bouaziz, Laurie %A Rat, Cédric %A Gocko, Xavier %A Cerisey, Catherine %A Aubin-Auger, Isabelle %A Ferrat, Emilie %< avec comité de lecture %@ 2044-6055 %J BMJ Open %I BMJ Publishing Group %V 12 %N 3 %P e058879 %8 2022-03-15 %D 2022 %R 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058879 %M 35292502 %K breast tumours %K preventive medicine %K primary care %K qualitative research %Z Life Sciences [q-bio]/Cancer %Z Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Gynecology and obstetrics %Z Life Sciences [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologieJournal articles %X Objective Breast cancer screening decision aids (DAs) are designed to help women decide whether or not to participate in mammography-based programmes. We aimed to explore women’s and healthcare professionals’ expectations of a breast cancer screening DA, as part of the French DEDICACES study. Methods This French qualitative study was based on semistructured, individual interviews with women from the general population, general practitioners (GPs), midwives, gynaecologists, radiologists and screening centre managers. Sampling was purposive and used diversification criteria. The inductive analysis was based on grounded theory. Results Between April 2018 and May 2019, we interviewed 40 people: 13 women, 14 GPs, 4 gynaecologists, 3 midwives, 3 radiologists and 3 screening centre managers. The women and the healthcare professionals considered that a DA could help to improve levels of knowledge, harmonise medical practice and provide reliable, comprehensive information. Overall, the interviewees wanted an easy-to-use, intuitive, graphic-rich, interactive, computer-based, patient-centred DA. Use of the DA might be limited by a lack of familiarity with shared decision-making (SDM), the risk of misuse and a preference for asymmetric positive information. Conclusion The present results are likely to facilitate the development of the first validated tool for SDM support in French breast cancer screening programmes. %G English %L hal-03932008 %U https://sorbonne-paris-nord.hal.science/hal-03932008 %~ INSERM %~ UNIV-ST-ETIENNE %~ UNIV-PARIS13 %~ CNRS %~ UNIV-LYON1 %~ UNIV-ANGERS %~ UNIV-POITIERS %~ SANTE_PUB_INSERM %~ IMRB %~ UPEC %~ LEPS %~ CAMPUS-CONDORCET %~ UDL %~ UNIV-LYON %~ SORBONNE-PARIS-NORD %~ UNIV-PARIS %~ UNIVERSITE-PARIS %~ CRCI2NA %~ NANTES-UNIVERSITE %~ NANTES-UNIV